Krauss Makes A Stand |
27th December 2007
The big story in the Chronicle today is Bozeman Mayor Jeff Krauss’s refusal to sign the recently passed Iraq anti-war resolution.
Krauss said he opposed the resolution for two reasons: he considered it inappropriate for the city to be discussing a federal issue; and U.S. troops’ perseverance in Iraq is saving lives.
I have written before about Krauss’s first point; whether or not local governments should be involved in federal issues. My finding then, which I still agree with, is that local governments are taking up this (and other) mantles in the absence of any kind of actual inspirational leader in our federal government executive. This is what I had to say at that time (about Kyoto):
I am constantly reminded, and impressed, by localized government entities that speak/act on issues of national (or in this case, international) importance. The number of city and county governments that have officially spoken up in support of the Kyoto Protocol is a fine example of this kind of local action, and this new agreement is an assertive extension of that kind of movement. This five-state venture is the most recent development in a series of pacts that these states have been working on for a while now.
When there is no real leadership; when nothing is getting done, more localized leadership has stepped up to fill in the void on issues like global warming, Iraq, and gun control.
Of course, we can (and we often do) argue about Krauss’s second point; that our presence in Iraq is worth the price(s) we are paying. If Krauss really thinks that a city government has no place in federal issues, then how does a Mayor have authority to speak to the effectiveness of U.S. troops in Iraq? It is a bit of a catch 22, but in the end this resolution passed and will go on to President Bush, Montana’s congressmen, and the Bozeman-area state reps, with or without Krauss’s signature.
In the space normally reserved for the mayor’s signature on the official copy of the resolution, two of the three commissioners who voted in favor of the resolution will sign instead, said City Manager Chris Kukulski. That is the protocol spelled out in the city charter. In addition, the resolution will note that Krauss refused to sign.


I was disappointed in the Bozeman Mayor’s vote and his explanation for it. Our mayor in Missoula, while hardly a leftist, broke the tie that to put our Irag referendum on the ballot. (I think Bozeman should have had a referendum, too, as I believe it has more weight than a council vote — but I’ll take what I can get when it comes to sending a message to Congress and the President.)
I guess Krauss wants us to sit on our hands while the supposed leadership in Washington tries to figure out what we should do with this fiasco called Iraq.
No, Pete. As he said quite clearly, he wants us to ‘win’. I’ll be the first to admit that he may not know how to ‘win’ anymore than anyone else, and that winning may not even be possible (especially considering that we can’t seem to even identify the ‘enemy’.) But it doesn’t serve us any better to create Strawmen out the opponent’s position than it does when they do it to ours.
Disclaimer: kindly keep in mind that my opinion is tempered by the sure and certain knowledge that no vote outside of an impeachment in the Congress will change jack sh!t in how the White House deals with Iraq.
Is our presence in Iraq is worth the price(s) we are paying?
Hell with that - it’s not worth the price they are paying. They can’t much stand to be saved anymore. It’s costing them too dearly.
Ask any Iraqi, he’ll tell you. They were better off under Saddam.
I’m sure Krauss wants to “win.” I’m not sure what a “win” would look like in Iraq. And maybe Krauss’ version of winning will happen: a couple more decades and a few thousand more deaths down the line.
The “sit on our hands” reference was my perspective on what Krauss would like Montanans to do instead of advancing resolutions and passing referendums. Screw him. I believe we have a responsibility at every level of government to push for an orderly withdrawal, sooner rather than later.
These anti war resolutions always remind me of 60’s era Miss America Pagent answers, ya know, like the ones about “World Peace”.
Wait till the crazies in Miszoo get wind of this one.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g7elze7lqKFMbYm3sgvVDdidqjQgD8TQN2I00
I was thinking about posting that, Swede, in hopes of planting a seed in someone’s mind. You know, just because I’m a Miszoo crazy.
Don’t feel bad, your mental state was not genetic, but brought on by ground water infiltration by MTBE, another failed idea by the powers to be in Missoula.
I’d prefer to think it was brought on by whiskey infiltrating the water in my glass.
We must protect your precious bodily fluids! Attack!!