Sometimes it occurs to me that between the fear and loathing in Helena and the fear and loathing in Washington DC, I forget that there are a lot of other things going on that we are ignoring. A readers letter this week pointed out one of those things; our national parks. You see, these are our treasures. They are our showcases, our history and our heritage. Just like all things of great value, once they are lost they can not be replaced.
The reader’s letter pointed out to me that it might be worth taking a look into how they are doing, particularly our own Big Hole National Park. It did not take too long to find out that there might be some problems in our National Park Service in general.
In 2004 the National Parks Service was instructed to begin cutting services at parks throughout the country. Though the parks budget had actually increased over the years, it was not increasing at the rate of expenses. In short, they were falling behind.
Facing what some people warn is a “crippling” budget shortfall, many national park superintendents are being asked to consider cutting their ranger staffs, services, and visitor center hours—and possibly even closing down completely on certain days.
Several advocacy groups now charge that the entire National Park System is menaced by a hidden crisis, and that Park Service officials are trying to cover it up.
This is a very bad thing people, but at least we found out about it early enough to correct the problems, right? Sure we had. Did we actually do anything? Not a chance.
We see that today park police staffing is at a 20 year low, even as park visitation increases and problems are compounding. President Bush has proposed a 3 billion dollar infusion over the next 10 years called the Centennial Initiative. While this sounds like a great idea, there are always string attached. In this piece, Ann Whisnant points out that Bush’s plan relies on an infusion of private dollars. She see the problem as
giving the administration another privatization wedge is a dubious proposition. No one knows what the quid pro quo will be. Private control of yet another area of public policy? Private interests, rather than public needs, dictating Centennial Initiative priorities? Routine park maintenance neglected in favor of glossier (and more fundable) specialty projects? Parks or park features named for corporations? The Google Grand Canyon, perhaps? Disney’s Dinosaur National Monument? Harrah’s Blue Ridge Parkway?
Far-fetched as these sound, an inescapable lesson of recent years is that things can (and will) get worse than we can possibly imagine in advance.
Read her whole piece for a real historic perspective on why the Centennial Initiative is simply not enough.
We can judge the health of our parks system by looking at our own Big Hole and how it is doing. I remember growing up and reading stories of Chief Joseph and the Nez Perce as they fought all across the west, seeking freedom from the government’s reservations. Against great odds, they fought the good fight. The image of Joseph and their stand at Big Hole and the travesty that followed has long been burned into my mind. The phrase “I will fight no more forever” is a part of our national conscience, we all know exactly what it means and what part of the soul it comes from. This is a piece of American heritage, honoring a group that typified the American spirit in a monumental quest for freedom. As a reminder of this spirit, I have pasted Joseph’s speech below the fold.
According to a report by the National Park Conservation Association, Big Hole is having problems. The park only received ‘fair’ ratings and is declining overall. It would be another travesty to let go of this piece of our history. The natural resources of this park are not being minded in the way that we would expect such an important piece of American heritage to be minded and I will remind you, once this is done it can not be undone.
I appreciate the President’s attempt to revamp our parks, but I come at it from another angle. In real dollar terms, 3 billion is simply not enough and it’s reliance on private contributions is bothersome. To be sure, I think that this is a bi-partisan issue if ever there was one and I would like to see a real effort made on both side of the aisle to come up with a working long term solution.
Read the rest of this entry »